Determination that husband fraudulently induced wife to execute prenuptial agreement was supported by the evidence, as required to set aside prenuptial agreement; trial court found that wife’s testimony was “credible,” “convincing,” “unequivocal,” and consistent with additional corroborative evidence, and that any inconsistencies in her testimony related to insignificant matters, and by contrast, found husband’s “credibility to be suspect,” due in part, to his “patent evasiveness.”
Laura Morgan is a Family Law Consultant. Laura is available for consultation, brief writing and research on family law issues throughout the country. She can be reached through her website. www.famlawconsult.com
Published on:
