Black v. Black states a deviation from a presumptive amount of child support for a particular expense may itself amount to an implicit order.
In dicta: “[A] deviation from the presumptive amount of child support for a particular expense may itself amount to an implicit order that the parent benefitting from the deviation pay that expense.”
_______________________________________________________________________________
Sarah McCormack grew up in Atlanta, Georgia, before receiving her undergraduate degree at the University of Virginia and her law degree at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. She has participated in two Georgia appellate decisions: Kean v. Marshall, 294 Ga. App. 459 (2008), and RTS Landfill, Inc. v. Appalachian Waste Systems, LLC, 267 Ga. App. 56 (2004). Ms. McCormack shares her household with her husband, Kevin McCormack, a Senior Web Producer for Turner Sports, her son, Dylan, and her daughter, Lark. She is with the firm of Kessler & Solomiany LLP, in Georgia.
Related Article
Child Support Software – Risks and Benefits
Black v. Black states a deviation from a presumptive amount of child support for a particular expense may itself amount to an implicit order.
Published on:
